Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 8473, 2024 04 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38605149

RESUMO

Nearly half of the deaths among hospitalized human immuno deficiency virus-infected patients in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era have been attributed to liver disease. This may range from an asymptomatic mild increase of liver enzymes to cirrhosis and liver failure. Different works of literature elucidated both retroviral infection and the adverse effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy as a cause of hepatotoxicity. Individual adaptations to medications and environmental exposures, shaped by cultural norms and genetic predispositions, could potentially modulate the risk and progression of liver disease in this population. Therefore, this study aims to assess the predictors of severe hepatotoxicity in retroviral-infected adults receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens within the Ilubabor Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted among adult retroviral-infected patients in five selected anti-retro virus therapy clinics from May1 to July 30/2022. A systematic sampling technique was used to select 457 study participants and Binary logistic regression statistical data analysis was used, P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The prevalence of severe hepatotoxicity was 21.44% in the study population. CD+4 count < 200 cells/mm3 (AOR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.04-5.22, P = 0.01), human immunodeficiency virus co-infection with tuberculosis (AOR = 2.82, 95% CI 1.01-8.29, P = 0.03) and human immuno deficiency virus co-infection with hepatitis-B/hepatitis C virus (AOR = 5.02, 95% CI 1.82-16.41) were predictors of severe hepatotoxicity. The magnitude of severe hepatotoxicity was high among adult retroviral-infected patients on highly active anti-retroviral drug regimens. Co-infection of human immuno deficiency virus with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus, tuberculosis and CD4+T-cell count below 200 cells/mm3 were predictors of severe hepatotoxicity. Therefore, HIV patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy require close attention and regular monitoring of their liver function.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Coinfecção , Doenças do Sistema Digestório , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Infecções por HIV , Hepatite C , Hepatopatias , Tuberculose , Adulto , Humanos , Terapia Antirretroviral de Alta Atividade/efeitos adversos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , HIV , Hepatopatias/etiologia , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Hepacivirus , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Digestório/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/epidemiologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/tratamento farmacológico , Contagem de Linfócito CD4
2.
J Multidiscip Healthc ; 15: 2527-2537, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36352855

RESUMO

Background: The nature of COVID-19 transmission creates significant risks in surgical departments owing to the close contact of medical staff with patients, the limited physical environment of the operating room and recovery room, the possibility of shared surgical equipment and challenges in the delivery of surgical care in all surgical departments. Globally, studies have reported that the effects of the pandemic on surgical departments are profound, potentially long-lasting and extensive. To manage these effects, different local guidelines and recommendations have been developed, with potential differences in their effectiveness and implementation. Therefore, harmonized and effective national/international guidelines for specific surgical departments during perioperative periods are pertinent to curtail the infection, and will inevitably need to be adapted for consistent and sustainable implementation by all medical staff. The pattern of surgical patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic at Jimma Medical Center (JMC), Ethiopia, has not been explored yet. The present study aimed to describe the pattern of perioperative surgical patient care, equipment handling and operating room management during the COVID-19 pandemic at JMC. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to describe the pattern of perioperative surgical patient care, equipment handling and operating room management during the COVID-19 pandemic at JMC, using five-point Likert scales (0, not at all; 1, rarely; 2, sometimes; 3, most of the time; 4, frequently). A total of 90 respondents [35 patients (five patients from each of seven surgical departments) and 55 healthcare providers (six professionals from each of nine units, including the center of sterility room and anesthesia)] who were available during the study period, selected by a convenience sampling technique with multistage clustering, participated in the study. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire via direct observation and face-to-face interviews with patients undergoing surgery, healthcare providers and hospital administrators, against the standard surgical patient care guidelines. The collected data were manually checked for missing values and outliers, cleared, entered into EpiData (v4.3.1) and exported to SPSS (v22) for analysis. The mean score of practice was compared among different disciplines by applying the unpaired t-test. The findings of the study were reported using tables and narration. A p-value of less than 0.05 was declared as statistically significant. Results: Despite the surgical care practice having changed during the COVID-19 pandemic in all service domains, it is not implemented consistently among different surgical departments owing to different barriers (lack of training on the updated guidelines and financial constraints). The majority of surgical staff were implementing the use of preventive measures against COVID-19, while they were practiced less among patients. The guidelines for surgical practice during the preoperative phase were well applied, especially screening patients by different methods and the application of telemedicine to reduce physical contacts. But, against guidelines, elective patients were planned and underwent surgery, especially in the general surgery department. The implementation of recommended guidelines in the center of sterility room in handling surgical equipment was not very different before and during the pandemic. The extent of practice for anesthesia care, operating room management and postoperative care in the recovery room also changed, and the guidelines were sometimes applied. Conclusion and Recommendations: Although perioperative surgical care practice differed before and during the pandemic, the standard guidelines were inconsistently implemented among surgical departments. The implementation of recommended guidelines in the center of sterility room in handling surgical equipment was not very different before and during the pandemic. Thus, the authors developed safe surgical care guidelines throughout the different domains (infection prevention and PPE use; preoperative care, intraoperative care, operating room management, anesthesia care, equipment handling process and postoperative care) for all disciplines and shared them with all staff. We recommend that all surgical staff should access these guidelines and strictly adhere to them for surgical service during the pandemic.

4.
Heliyon ; 7(2): e06339, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33681502

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major global health threat worldwide. Obesity and overweight is major risk factor for its development. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and associated factors of overweight/obesity among diabetic outpatients at Jimma Medical Center, Southwest Ethiopia. METHODS: Hospital-based, cross-sectional study was conducted during March 02 to June 30, 2020 among systematically selected participants at the study area. Bivariable and multivariable binary logistic regression were used to identify the factors associated with outcome variable. Variables with a p value of<0.25 on bivariable logistic regression were considered candidates for multivariable regression. On multivariable logistic regression variables with p-value of <0.05 were considered as significantly associated with overweight/obesity. RESULTS: A total of 334 participants with mean age of 51.42 ± 13.33 years were included in the study. The prevalence of overweight/obesity among the study population was 36.2%. According to multivariable logistic regression analysis, residence (AOR = 1.8, 95%CI:1, 3), higher income tercile (AOR = 3.4, 95%CI:1.8, 6.7), family history of overweight and obesity (AOR = 1.9, 95%CI:1.1,3.4), comorbid hypertension (AOR = 2.4, 95%CI:1.4,4) and physical inactivity (AOR = 2.1, 95%CI:1.2,3.5) were significantly associated with overweight/obesity. CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence of overweight/obesity among study participants. It was found that higher income tercile, residence, family history of overweight and obesity, comorbid hypertension and physical inactivity were significantly associated with overweight/obesity.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA